From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,5f5a48f21d7f7525 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "J-P. Rosen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Inferring array index type from array object Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:16:19 +0200 Organization: Adalog Message-ID: References: <6b20ed09-efc1-4df7-90f9-5e141482e8d0@d37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <1305oqccr1h2t$.x33x4oxwd84d$.dlg@40tude.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 06:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org; posting-host="gvUZRpxaaF0O8loDby5+9w"; logging-data="32231"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Ms6tBzcugbUlneGnatVPZ" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:KoJm2PELC8vFqQbDwF13hKvvs/M= Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12881 Date: 2010-06-24T08:16:19+02:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff a �crit : > I'd suggest something like "default_integer_range". It's not just > for 'for' loops -- the same language malfeature occurs for array > type decls, for example. > The "_for" is because I have separate rules for loops, indexing, case statements... -- --------------------------------------------------------- J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr) Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr