From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6609c40f81b32989 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,9bdec20bcc7f3687 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 101deb,e67cdb1dcad3c668 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,gid8d3408f8c3,gidbda4de328f,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.belwue.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!not-for-mail From: Peter Hermann Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1 Subject: Re: Why is Ada considered "too specialized" for scientific use Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:26:30 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Comp.Center (RUS), U of Stuttgart, FRG Message-ID: References: <4bb9c72c$0$6990$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <4bba8bf1$0$56418$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <4bbb2246$8$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net> <4bbb5386$0$56422$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <4bbdf5c6$1$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net> <4c0a2e36$0$34205$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <4c0b234f$1$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net> X-Trace: infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de 1275999990 23723 141.58.7.20 (8 Jun 2010 12:26:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@news.uni-stuttgart.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:26:30 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.9.2-20070201 ("Dalaruan") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.26-2-686 (i686)) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12447 comp.lang.fortran:26511 comp.lang.pl1:1543 Date: 2010-06-08T12:26:30+00:00 List-Id: In comp.lang.ada J. Clarke wrote: > working with assembler but in my day it was a 1:1 correspondence--you > knew exactly what binary each assembly language instruction would emit, in the zenith of Assembler (-: i.e. after your time :-) we had macros which could produce hundreds of statements with one stroke...