From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Peter Flass <Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1
Subject: Re: Why is Ada considered "too specialized" for scientific use
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 06:43:06 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <hul6rp$dk$1@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <hp95j8$i29$1@speranza.aioe.org>
   <4bba8bf1$0$56418$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
 <4bbb2246$8$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
 <4bbb5386$0$56422$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
 <m2tyrnjc5f.fsf@pushface.org> <4bbdf5c6$1$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
 <f5a9304e-e6eb-40b2-8944-a6ca4bc92b1b@q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
 <4c0a2e36$0$34205$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
 <4c0b234f$1$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
 <nospam-C84D27.10531806062010@earthlink.us.supernews.com>
 <hugkq9$u0t$1@speranza.aioe.org> <hugt0812ccm@news2.newsguy.com>
 <7plPn.6395$z%6.5719@edtnps83>
 <4c0ded8f$0$6759$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:43:05 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="V8SydqRRXuF8ysuwvpMn7w";
	logging-data="436"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19sTm2db0PgZdNQup5sFF7h"
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
In-Reply-To: <4c0ded8f$0$6759$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KJ8yr75xRh+70X0mdLY2YLbNgeA=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11470 comp.lang.fortran:24188
 comp.lang.pl1:1426
Date: 2010-06-08T06:43:06-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Georg Bauhaus wrote:
> On 6/8/10 8:27 AM, James J. Weinkam wrote:
> 
>> Nevertheless, it remains true that the assembly language programmer who
>> knows what he is about has complete control over the binary code
>> generated, although I would venture to say that few, if any, assembly
>> language programmers think of what they are doing in those terms most of
>> the time.
> 
> Would this control include control over pipelines, parallelism,
> and possibly translation of assembly instructions to microcode?
> 

Probably more so than with a(n) HLL.  For example, if you're concerned 
about it, you can organize instructions to maximize parallelism.