From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!83.128.0.12.MISMATCH!news-out2.kabelfoon.nl!newsfeed.kabelfoon.nl!xindi.nntp.kabelfoon.nl!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Peter Flass Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1 Subject: Re: Why is Ada considered "too specialized" for scientific use Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 17:57:20 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <4bb9c72c$0$6990$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <4bba8bf1$0$56418$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <4bbb2246$8$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net> <4bbb5386$0$56422$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <4bbdf5c6$1$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net> <4c0a2e36$0$34205$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <4c0b234f$1$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net> <4c0cc11c$0$56569$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <874gafFcadU1@mid.individual.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 21:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="V8SydqRRXuF8ysuwvpMn7w"; logging-data="22681"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18uW7MseKWC+dSYk/0Qlw3d" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) In-Reply-To: <874gafFcadU1@mid.individual.net> Cancel-Lock: sha1:vQOfm5VMw3cA1jp90LZ3nk67EFI= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11452 comp.lang.fortran:24174 comp.lang.pl1:1414 Date: 2010-06-07T17:57:20-04:00 List-Id: Dick Hendrickson wrote: > On 6/7/10 7:35 AM, Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) wrote: >> Le Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:40:07 +0200, Peter Flass >> a écrit: >>> If you want to talk *really* old assemblers, look at SOAP. The >>> hardware had no core, only drum memory, >> What is a “drum memory” ? >> >> > I think it was the successor to CRT memories. ;) > Or mercury delay-lines.