From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: Gib Bogle <g.bogle@auckland.no.spam.ac.nz>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1
Subject: Re: Why is Ada considered "too specialized" for scientific use
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 11:01:22 +1200
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <huh9c2$v04$1@speranza.aioe.org>
References: <hp95j8$i29$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <4bb9c72c$0$6990$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <pan.2010.04.05.20.51.46.20000@none.net>
 <4bba8bf1$0$56418$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
 <4bbb2246$8$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
 <4bbb5386$0$56422$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
 <m2tyrnjc5f.fsf@pushface.org> <4bbdf5c6$1$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
 <f5a9304e-e6eb-40b2-8944-a6ca4bc92b1b@q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
 <4c0a2e36$0$34205$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
 <4c0b234f$1$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
 <hugevn02qfb@news5.newsguy.com> <op.vdv17504z25lew@macpro-eth1.krischik.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 6Y+xB2HTf02odAYT5t1dog.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12350 comp.lang.fortran:26413
 comp.lang.pl1:1498
Date: 2010-06-07T11:01:22+12:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Martin Krischik wrote:
> Am 06.06.2010, 17:19 Uhr, schrieb J. Clarke <jclarke.usenet@cox.net>:
> 
>> On 6/6/2010 12:25 AM, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote:
> 
>> What do you believe to be the difference between machine code and 
>> assembler?
> 
> 6502 Assembler:
> 
>     LDA #10
> 
> 6502 Machine code:
> 
>     A9 10
> 
> Any more silly questions?

Yes.  What relevance does this have for Fortran?