From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,997e6472f58cc955 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-04 15:31:40 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!news-xfer.cox.net!peer01.cox.net!cox.net!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 17:31:34 -0500 Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 17:32:00 -0500 From: Wesley Groleau Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com Organization: Ain't no organization here! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-mx, pt-br, fr-ca MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Case dependence and coding standards References: <035odv8mfiksmqo69q0250qp141oebtdro@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.117.18.46 X-Trace: sv3-uQ9bW6Nly7GjLm6d88x9C6Pf4X9H/mhHd0uyYiB/fQb09y65vaHzsSPHo4ZDW5tl7DLhZknm/4rzWF1!CGVALBB9ZEkRH39CgrfJi9lOYsalVhDLpfHbzbC6uLLGXJV7g9mCo5Vuq3zlePxBBEekGQ9xhmhT!UWEl X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38648 Date: 2003-06-04T17:32:00-05:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus wrote: > Wesley Groleau wrote: > : Rational's pretty-printer as of 4.2 can vertically align all of: > : > : := in out => : -- (although it's still not perfect) > > Tabular layout may or may not be an > advantage , I am still eager to > hear arguments , other than tired programmers > liking the tidy look of it . > > Georg First, I mentioned that it can vertically align a certain set of symbols in source code, not all words in English prose. Second, source code does not contain multiple words in prose style. Third, Variable : Variable_Type; -- does the one thing Another_Variable : Another_Variable_Type; -- does the other thing IS a table in nature: first column - object name; second column - object type; third column - clarification; column separators - ':' and '--' Makes sense to me to write it like one: Variable : Variable_Type; -- number of doohickies built Another_Variable : Another_Variable_Type; -- the current one built here Same meaning to the compiler, MUCH easier on the human reader. Notice that I never intended screwing up the comments as your strawman suggests. There is precedent for doing the same thing even in prose. Look at the section starting with uppercase IS. When I was a technical writer, I would never have handed to the editor something like that formatter like this: IS a table in nature: first column is object name, second column is object type, third column is clarification, and the column separators are the colons and the double hyphens.