From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,c689b55786a9f2bd
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.in2p3.fr!in2p3.fr!news.ecp.fr!news.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: for S'Image use Func??
Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 19:06:22 -0500
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen
Message-ID: <hs4ua1$40i$1@munin.nbi.dk>
References: <Xns9D7085FECB88EWarrensBlatherings@188.40.43.213>
 <op.vcaqajn0ule2fv@garhos> <Xns9D70A3756AAE0WarrensBlatherings@188.40.43.213>
 <wccmxwcu6kc.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <op.vcaxs1h4ule2fv@garhos>
 <wcceihou455.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <hs0jm5$vr4$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <wcchbmjlx6a.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <4be417b4$0$6992$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <wccpr17yeji.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <op.vccd27e2xmjfy8@garhos>
 <1b4dbbn0xubms$.1pmm5qr1dwcdt$.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vccqj6aoule2fv@garhos>
 <hs1t6h$kj2$1@tornado.tornevall.net> <hs200a$hg4$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <hs23ks$8vq$2@tornado.tornevall.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net
X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1273363585 4114 69.95.181.76 (9 May 2010 00:06:25 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 00:06:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11417
Date: 2010-05-08T19:06:22-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.acm.org> wrote in message 
news:hs23ks$8vq$2@tornado.tornevall.net...
> Randy Brukardt wrote:
>>
>> If I actually used a signature line, I think I'd be using that one!!
>
> Thanks. Why not use a signature line?

I'm an antique: I still type all of my message (other than part I'm replying 
to) by hand. That includes the signature. "Randy." is easy enough to type; a 
complex signature isn't.

                        Randy.