From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6609c40f81b32989 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.erje.net!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: BrianG Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Why is Ada considered "too specialized" for scientific use Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:03:29 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <4bb9c72c$0$6990$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <4bbb3f22$0$7660$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 02:03:11 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="liY6QHLqmAG1K722MUWNZg"; logging-data="6098"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+9TVGNb9FBb8IW/koQqI2t" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) In-Reply-To: <4bbb3f22$0$7660$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> Cancel-Lock: sha1:jc1fAw09blhN8MmT8+dISJlNgpY= Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:10874 Date: 2010-04-06T22:03:29-04:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus wrote: > Keith Thompson schrieb: >> Georg Bauhaus writes: >> [...] >>> C99 (note the year) has complex types, says C hasn't. Well, it >>> hadn't, as some point in the last century. >> [...] >> >> Unfortunately, the C99 standard has not yet been universally adopted. >> Very few compilers fully support it. And this differs from Ada'05 how? How many compilers support it? More importantly (to me), how many non-compiler tools support it? --Bg