From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,6609c40f81b32989
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.velia.net!news.tu-darmstadt.de!news.belwue.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!not-for-mail
From: Peter Hermann <h@h.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Why is Ada considered  "too specialized" for scientific use
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:52:28 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Comp.Center (RUS), U of Stuttgart, FRG
Message-ID: <hpf08s$r2k$1@infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
References: <hp95j8$i29$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <1jgf8mb.1wtzpqi19npchdN%csampson@inetworld.net>
X-Trace: infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de 1270547548 27732 141.58.7.20 (6 Apr
 2010 09:52:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@news.uni-stuttgart.de
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:52:28 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/1.9.2-20070201 ("Dalaruan") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.26-2-686 (i686))
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9890
Date: 2010-04-06T09:52:28+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Charles H. Sampson <csampson@inetworld.net> wrote:
>      Has anyone written a paper "Ada for Scientific Programming"?  I

http://www.ihr.uni-stuttgart.de/forschung/ada/resources_on_ada/
look into "SEE Ada"