From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,d513f20add779b3d X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.mixmin.net!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Clubley Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Migrating to Ada : a mini success story Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <6629985a-f872-4707-b996-17180cb5f15b@q16g2000yqq.googlegroups.com> Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: feeder.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4pjzwDT2MPp9AkNxUo/C4Q"; logging-data="27801"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18OWseP50BOv+xdvEbCl7FEIjTndrVRiEQ=" User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (VMS/Multinet) Cancel-Lock: sha1:dCH0s9um0TeXmAQeWWb4x3rQ3W8= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9270 Date: 2010-02-16T17:48:47+00:00 List-Id: On 2010-02-15, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Simon Clubley wrote on comp.lang.ada: >> I would love to find an open source equivalent of the forms and ISAM >> toolkits which could be called from Ada. > > For the forms toolkit, I'd start with TextTools[1]. It may not be > complete enough but certainly provides a starting point. > Thanks for the pointer; I didn't know this toolkit existed. You are correct that it's not functional enough to replace the Synergex forms toolkit, but I am going to look at it anyway sometime over the next few weeks to see what it is capable of. > For ISAM, it depends on whether you need support for a specific binary > file format or if you are content with equivalent functionality. > > If binary compatibility doesn't matter, I'd suggest writing an Ada > binding to Berkeley DB[2] or using the existing GNADE[3] binding to > SQLite[4]. The former is faster because it uses no SQL parser. The > latter is more structured, thanks to SQL. In both cases, the file > format will stand the test of time; that's the main benefit of free > software. > Binary compatibility does not matter. The Berkeley DB library seems to have had a serious reworking since I last looked at it and dismissed it, so I will have a look at that as well. Thanks for the pointers, Simon. -- Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP Microsoft: Bringing you 1980's technology to a 21st century world