From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,57f8540942f8e060
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Initialization and Finalization of limited object "returned" by a
  function
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:48:29 -0600
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen
Message-ID: <hl28gu$nam$1@munin.nbi.dk>
References: <ed41ec55-1c33-4ea0-95db-01a89103d70a@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
 <wcceikrx0o1.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <d1d2586a-2f70-491a-8a12-01abae4ab6f5@t34g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
 <wcc4olnd1w0.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <75a9f860-ad3c-49a0-b2a1-a8f1386e6ff6@x10g2000prk.googlegroups.com>
 <2801be3a-afd6-4d14-ad7f-feb23a511f02@a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
 <dc94f9cd-d9e9-400b-bb1d-836023f55724@x22g2000yqx.googlegroups.com>
 <wcc4olnid67.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net
X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1265935711 23894 69.95.181.76 (12 Feb 2010 00:48:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:48:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9137
Date: 2010-02-11T18:48:29-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Robert A Duff" <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> wrote in message 
news:wcc4olnid67.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com...
...
> Extended return statements are important in the limited case,
> because you often want to say something like "Result.X := ...;".
> And as you discovered, aggregates aren't allowed for protected
> or task types (which was probably a language design mistake).

One that we tried to fix last time (for a while at least), but the attempt 
led us down quite a rabbit hole. Enough that Paris became snow-covered while 
we discussed it (and then returned to normal when we gave up). OK, maybe the 
snow had nothing to do with this topic of discussion, but it was memorable.

                            Randy.