From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,bf03d731a6ef511f X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.erje.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Copying rows in a two dimensional array. Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: J4HSNf9Eqj44wTz1J3b8lQ.user.speranza.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8993 Date: 2010-02-08T18:53:53+00:00 List-Id: > In Ada, if you do "P(X(5..10));" procedure P can see that the > lower bound is 5. That's a break in the abstraction -- P shouldn't > know or care where the string came from. For many, but not all, P. > Actually, slices are one of the least useful features of Ada. > I wouldn't mind (much) if they didn't exist in the first place. Wow, I beg to strongly differ.