From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.acm.org>
Subject: Re: Multiple Delay alternatives : what it is useful to ?
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:47:58 -0700
Date: 2010-02-03T21:47:58-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <hkdk6b$7kq$1@tornado.tornevall.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <77f81f9d-23a2-4d59-a547-c577e009c50c@19g2000yql.googlegroups.com>
Hibou57 (Yannick Duch�ne) wrote:
>
> By the way, a sentence is unclear to me : at 9.7.1(10), there is a �
> If a selective_accept contains more than one delay_alternative, then
> all shall be delay_relative_statements, or all shall be
> delay_until_statements for the same time type. � .... same time type ?
> I could not construe these last three words.
Ada.Calendar.Time and Ada.Real_Time.Time are 2 different time types, and an
implementation may provide others.
--
Jeff Carter
"Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
07
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-04 4:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-04 3:47 Multiple Delay alternatives : what it is useful to ? Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2010-02-04 4:47 ` Jeffrey R. Carter [this message]
2010-02-04 9:26 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2010-02-04 18:48 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2010-02-05 21:55 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox