From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,fb89149bff45fa40 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trnddc03.POSTED!da33a4ab!not-for-mail From: Fionn mac Cuimhaill Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: gwindows as target from rapid Message-ID: References: <116a1020.0409021406.64897ff7@posting.google.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 16:58:56 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.41.197.98 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: trnddc03 1094489936 4.41.197.98 (Mon, 06 Sep 2004 12:58:56 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 12:58:56 EDT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3390 Date: 2004-09-06T16:58:56+00:00 List-Id: On 2 Sep 2004 15:06:31 -0700, mcneills@landcareresearch.co.nz (Stephen McNeill) wrote: >Peter Hermann wrote in message news:... >> Frank Piron wrote: >> > > Is there a gwindows discussion group? >> > >> > Once there was a mailing list: gnavi-list@gnavi.org. >> > But i don't know if there is a chance of getting a >> > response. >> >> this mail-address does not ( or no more(?) ) exist. > >The email-address indeed doesn't exist. > >Some time ago there was some brief discussion about the future >direction of Gwindows. Nothing came of that, so I wanted to know if >Gwindows is something people are still interested in, or should we give >it a decent burial? If it is still needed, perhaps we need to organise >ourselves to be able to get the package to a state we're happy with. > >Regards >Stephen I'm using it, and am planning on adding substantial extensions to the printing support, as well as to other parts of GWindows.