From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,dea2d62ab1462538 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!news.stack.nl!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Writing an Operating System in Ada Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: +ERTOT2Y9KJRZ8n+NpAZGA.user.speranza.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.1 X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Cancel-Lock: sha1:REJ2RFKbfY5x0bIsp+gjWmN7+qQ= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8752 Date: 2010-01-14T18:57:25+00:00 List-Id: > Yes I do. IIRC, the project failed because they completely missed the > point. The processor was intended to be able to check the types of data > at run-time, something that the compiler had already done. Not all code is generated by Ada compilers. A secure processor could help defend against virus infections.