From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ed023c7889c56295
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-28 03:32:27 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Compiler Complaint ?
Date: 28 Aug 2001 05:32:16 -0500
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <hiDgpI2jSYKZ@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <GUDi7.52672$54.2837690@e420r-atl1.usenetserver.com>
 <mailman.998993202.10206.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 998994240 11085 192.135.80.34 (28 Aug 2001
 10:24:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:24:00 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12506
Date: 2001-08-28T05:32:16-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <mailman.998993202.10206.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>, "David C. Hoos, Sr." <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com> writes:
> Since file IO can only be done in whole bytes, what
> was your intention in instantiating Integer_IO for
> your Bit type?  E.g., ion which bit of each byte would
> the data bit reside?
> 
> Incidentally, the type bit would probably be better defined
> as mod 2 instead of range 0 .. 1.

Why would that be better?