From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Scheduling behaviour issue
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:38:39 +0300
Organization: Tidorum Ltd
Message-ID: <hgdgigFpaklU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ly1rofhhyf.fsf@pushface.org> <hgbf8aFcbk1U1@mid.individual.net>
 <lyblnilbcm.fsf@pushface.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net kpgMSI1crwFKUUaJJiZghAFNzwjG2v2Fq8KizPYS8f/R6nUpvF
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mgxMUCIlIPRCoSWD/guesb8aHm4=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
In-Reply-To: <lyblnilbcm.fsf@pushface.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:58473
Date: 2020-04-23T15:38:39+03:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2020-04-23 13:56, Simon Wright wrote:
> Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> writes:
    [snip]

>> Under RTEMS ...

> So FreeRTOS behaves in the same way as RTEMS?

Sorry, brain fart, I meant FreeRTOS, which you spoke of. (I had other 
correspondence at the same time involving RTEMS, and was confused.) I 
don't know, of my own knowledge, how either FreeRTOS or RTEMS behaves on 
this issue.

-- 
Niklas Holsti
Tidorum Ltd
niklas holsti tidorum fi
       .      @       .