From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5faad1722103f6a7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Dmitry A. Kazakov Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: 7E7 Flight Controls Electronics Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 09:54:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de JfaTiV6Ny6abm/3h56qagg9hOJidA+Gpi7u6R4UlvL6o+PZic= X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1279 Date: 2004-06-09T09:54:36+02:00 List-Id: On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 05:32:19 +0400 (MSD), "Alexander E. Kopilovich" wrote: >I remember that several years ago Robert Dewar remarked (here in comp.lang.ada >or elsewhere) that the concept of "object" in current COBOL standard is more >rich and complex than even in C++ (and certainly more rich and complex than >in Ada). ARM 3.3: "Objects are created at run time and contain a value of a given type." I know no richer concept of object. -- Regards, Dmitry Kazakov www.dmitry-kazakov.de