From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,3315dcc90287cdfa X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!209.244.4.230!newsfeed1.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Mutations and type usage in Ada Date: 13 Feb 2006 14:57:35 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1139864232 4288 192.135.80.34 (13 Feb 2006 20:57:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2881 Date: 2006-02-13T14:57:35-06:00 List-Id: In article , "Jeffrey R. Carter" writes: > Larry Kilgallen wrote: > >> If such work passes peer review, then there is a management problem. > > A review by the peers ("equals") of such a person will not catch the problem, > since such peers, by definition, make the same mistake and see nothing wrong in it. Meaning there was a management failure in training/hiring/firing.