From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
From: hazlewlj@aston.ac.uk (Les Hazlewood)
Subject: Re: Any research putting c above ada?
Date: 1997/05/20
Message-ID: <hazlewlj-2005971331020001@ljh-14.aston.ac.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 242581141
References: <JSA.97May14201336@alexandria> <5le6vf$15p@bcrkh13.bnr.ca>
Organization: Aston University, England
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-05-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


I've just spent a very disappointing 20 mins trying to find any research
that puts C above Ada in this thread. Looking at the last dozen or so
posts I couldn't find *any research* on *any topic* !!!

Could someone tell me why posters don't start new threads when what they
have to say has nothing (or at the most charitable, very little) to do
with the current tread title?

Les Hazlewood