From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,be23df8e7e275d73
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-04 17:01:40 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!jfk3-feed1.news.digex.net!dca6-feed2.news.digex.net!intermedia!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!chnws02.mediaone.net!chnws06.ne.mediaone.net!24.128.8.70!typhoon.ne.mediaone.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Jeff Creem" <jeff@thecreems.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <mailman.995648003.8404.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <9kea9a$lsc$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9keduf$qvc$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
 <Reza7.18403$px7.4304991@nnrp1.proxad.net>
 <9kelv1$riq$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
 <dVsb7.5035$2i4.5346431@nnrp6.proxad.net> <ulmkxuy80.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
 <bFxb7.6327$bO7.5653610@nnrp6.proxad.net> <un15dgn63.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov>
 <JHNb7.7167$2j2.5927018@nnrp6.proxad.net>
 <kcOb7.4612$e%4.140534@news3.oke.nextra.no>
 <YpOb7.13370$II7.2424964@nnrp4.proxad.net>
 <y%Ob7.737$ep5.11352@news1.okOrganization: LJK Software
 <uiGL0WHzXluf@eisner.encompasserve.org> <DMac7.86$E96.95326@nnrp4.proxad.net>
 <9krkfa$g12$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <nedc7.175$Ej6.152700@nnrp4.proxad.net>
 <u66byfd4u.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov> <Cerc7.502$MR5.525509@nnrp3.proxad.net>
 <3b9456ca.15085013@news.tc.umn.edu>
Subject: Re: More Uniform Ada libraries (was: Proving Correctness)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Message-ID: <hXdl7.17095$zj5.4256817@typhoon.ne.mediaone.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 00:01:17 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.147.117.96
X-Complaints-To: abuse@mediaone.net
X-Trace: typhoon.ne.mediaone.net 999648077 24.147.117.96 (Tue,
 04 Sep 2001 20:01:17 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 20:01:17 EDT
Organization: Road Runner
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12729
Date: 2001-09-05T00:01:17+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


<brentcarnellis@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b9456ca.15085013@news.tc.umn.edu...
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2001 07:47:46 GMT, "nicolas" <n.brunot@cadwin.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >Aonix Objectada is excellent for us, except that link time is far too
long
> >for our applications and cannot be used today for dayly development
> >When the link time is 12mns instead of 20s, and has to be done 10 or 20
> >times a day, it is a problem.
>
> You have something royally screwed up in your environment.
> Meaty-sized 50 Megabyte executables link in about 10 seconds with GNAT
> (Sun, SGI, Linux, etc).
>
> >Will Aonix go on with Ada ? some have doubts
> >
> >Rational Apex is not bad, but still have some little problems
>
> No Apex has big problems for student programs, like not doing
> Text_IO.Get_Line correctly.
>
>

Hmm.. I have had my share of complaints over the years with Apex but not
doing Text_IO.Get_Line correctly was never one of them...There are probably
literally > 100 million lines of code of Ada compiled with Apex deployed in
the world so to
assume that it is that broken on a regular basis is.....odd..