From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,18b00985106487ae
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-30 10:53:08 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!zeus.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!news.octanews.net!attcg2!ip.att.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Licensing issues (Was: [Announce] Mneson : persistent untyped
Date: 30 Mar 2004 12:53:02 -0600
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <hN+AJ8OknLve@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <pl1xnd6kys.fsf_-_@sparre.crs4.it>
 <83I9c.25796$w54.167855@attbi_s01> <40681380.4080901@noplace.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1080672744 14089 192.135.80.34 (30 Mar 2004
 18:52:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 18:52:24 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6675
Date: 2004-03-30T12:53:02-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <40681380.4080901@noplace.com>, Marin David Condic <nobody@noplace.com> writes:
> Maybe we need a term to use for software that is open source but doesn't 
> meet the requirements of the owners of the words "Open Source"?

Who are the "owners" of those words ?

How does one apply for word ownership ?