From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f948976d12c7ee33
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-29 14:31:37 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!xmission!news-out.spamkiller.net!propagator2-maxim!news-in-maxim.spamkiller.net!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Boeing and Dreamliner
Date: 29 Jun 2003 16:31:34 -0500
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <hEE+2H5rHMDQ@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <mailman.4.1056169754.352.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <zN9Ja.2184$N%6.569@nwrdny02.gnilink.net> <3EFC6FC2.B96DAEA4@adaworks.com>
 <1056731513.272294@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <e2e5731a.0306271633.20140ba6@posting.google.com>
 <k2wLa.21663$N%6.3746@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>
 <e2e5731a.0306290856.4990acaf@posting.google.com>
 <RTHLa.23921$N%6.8888@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>
 <O06WkEY4SjOG@eisner.encompasserve.org>
 <uJILa.24085$N%6.15479@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1056922287 31831 192.135.80.34 (29 Jun 2003
 21:31:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 21:31:27 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39910
Date: 2003-06-29T16:31:34-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <uJILa.24085$N%6.15479@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>, Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> writes:
> Larry Kilgallen wrote:
>> With Ariane 5, a human decision was made to change the context.
> 
> Please read the investigation report. It's clear from the report
> that they think this decision was made because the Ariane 4 SRI
> software did not come with sufficiently clear documentation that
> this ocntext existed.

Assuming there is no context for a piece of software is fatuous.