From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, LOTS_OF_MONEY,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4eb65fab6deaa097 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: Ada test example - Linux Software Installer Date: 2000/05/08 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 620437159 References: <87aeidsgr8.fsf@think.mihalis.net> <8ep009$is3$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8es4p0$423$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <87pur1ti2x.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org> <8euj3d$qtk$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3913A546.3ADC7EB7@online.no> <8f2jhl$35m$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Trace: news.decus.org 957738725 12274 KILGALLEN [216.44.122.34] Organization: LJK Software Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <8f2jhl$35m$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, Robert Dewar writes: > In article , > Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam wrote: >> That sounds like a worthwhile project, but if you want to >> increase acceptance, please do _not_ license it in such a way >> that anyone who distributes the installer (such as, with their >> software) has to distribute the source to the software. >> Muddying the waters of Ada Advocacy with Open Source Advocacy >> would not increase adoption. > > The GPL is fine for this purpose, there is no way that the GPL > could be argued to apply to things the installer was installing. > I suspect many readers of CLA are not aware of the principle of > misuse of copyright. It is quite an instructive reminder in this > kind of case :-) I see I did not express my concern accurately. I am trying to avoid a requirement for those using the installer to distribute the source of the installer.