From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,aa0f5be20f540641 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-18 09:37:40 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!out.nntp.be!propagator-dallas!news-in-dallas.newsfeeds.com!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Ted Dennison References: Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 released Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:37:33 EDT Organization: http://www.newsranger.com Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:37:33 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8855 Date: 2001-06-18T16:37:33+00:00 List-Id: In article , Harris says... > >now that gcc 3.0 is released, I want to know if there are still plans >to incorporate gnat into gcc's source tree for 3.1? Anybody know how >things stand as of now? :-) Not only did we both ask this same question simultaniously, but when I went to check the gcc mailing list archives for info, the only message I found for today was another Ada-gcc3 question. One would think there's a lot of pent-up-interest, or something. :-) --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com