From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,be98569334bf359 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.news-service.com!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed-fusi2.netcologne.de!newsreader2.netcologne.de!not-for-mail From: Frederik Sausmikat Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: C++ threads vs. Ada tasks - surprised Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:04:15 +0200 Distribution: world Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: xdsl-81-173-145-103.netcologne.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: newsreader2.netcologne.de 1250496254 15258 81.173.145.103 (17 Aug 2009 08:04:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@netcologne.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:04:14 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) In-Reply-To: Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7836 Date: 2009-08-17T10:04:15+02:00 List-Id: Maciej Sobczak wrote: > My expectations were wrong, as the Ada version proved to be ~2x faster > on my machine (with GNAT 4.4.0 and g++ 4.4.0, taken from the same > package, both versions compiled with -O2). Just FYI, on my machine the C++ version is the one being ~2x faster (both gnat and g++ are version 4.3.3 here). Regards, Freddy