From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,1fc88aa02a884aed X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 07:15:03 -0500 Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 07:44:13 -0400 From: Jeffrey Creem User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada 2005 Compilers References: <1178047344.037041.49760@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <1s8lg4-fil.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com> <1178100726.17912.14.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1178100726.17912.14.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.147.74.171 X-Trace: sv3-a3jL6BmRPB8t/G/tkoF8iVKIz5NivsVFNGRq10Hyp1mRTEDFuo1vOFu/aCHGO/Qaal5znZDrBQpdwwZ!EFqDwwA67hqZ5EQVrB3wPAZVhtiU5GWn8EE1mgDx5Wz3kjENN2OKVQSZCtkB+y7vqP2coH9nQHNO!K5neXYUnIDeWuV49Vq8x0A== X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.34 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15465 Date: 2007-05-02T07:44:13-04:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus wrote: > On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 22:15 -0400, Jeffrey Creem wrote: > >> Greenhills has said that none of their customers have asked for it where >> none is defined as just me and apparently some customers in Europe. > > Do you find the remarks on AdaMulti in the Wikibook informative? > Should something be added? > http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Ada_Programming/Installing#AdaMulti_from_Green_Hills_Software Yes..Something should be added. Perhaps I'll add to it at some point. > > >> As far as I know the standard is still not fully official. The technical >> features have been approved. Not sure what is taking ISO so long to get >> it out the door at this point. > Status: Published standard > http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=45001&ICS1=35&ICS2=60&ICS3=&scopelist= > > Thanks. I had not looked carefully since January and since nothing had been posted here (at least that I saw) and nothing was on AdaIC I assumed it was still unpublished.