From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 5b1e799cdb,3ef3e78eacf6f938 X-Google-Attributes: gid5b1e799cdb,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: Tetrahedral Quartz Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.modula3,comp.lang.pascal.misc,comp.programming Subject: Re: Alternatives to C: ObjectPascal, Eiffel, Ada or Modula-3? Followup-To: comp.programming Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:48:05 -0400 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: pgCEXLytzHToJK9keTbw8w.user.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.7.9 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 090720-0, 20/07/2009), Outbound message Cancel-Lock: sha1:MNqKp2k2VIe6mQDESzmJ15mZ3Vk= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.eiffel:339 comp.lang.ada:7189 comp.lang.modula3:60 comp.lang.pascal.misc:305 comp.programming:11909 Date: 2009-07-20T15:48:05-04:00 List-Id: tm wrote: > That is exactly the area where Ada left the path of Pascal. Pascal > was designed to be easy to implement. Nicklaus Wirth had good > reasons to keep the implementation simple. He once said (IIRC): > > What can be parsed easily by a compiler can also be > parsed easily by a human and this can be an asset. The converse, however, is not necessarily true: that which cannot be parsed easily by a compiler sometimes still can be parsed easily by a human. This will remain so until strong AI is developed.