From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f05f6c2ca4c91ddd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: gwinn@res.ray.com (Joe Gwinn) Subject: Re: long term viability of Ada Date: 1996/10/02 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 186813381 distribution: world x-disclaimer: This is the author's opinion and not that of Raytheon Company. references: <324219D1.15FFEF33@bright.net> <01bba6ce$f10dae20$488371a5@dhoossr.iquest.com> x-authentication-warning: The author was not authenticated. content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Raytheon Electronic Systems mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-10-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <01bba6ce$f10dae20$488371a5@dhoossr.iquest.com>, "David C. Hoos, Sr." wrote: > -- > Greg A Barnett wrote in article [snip] > > > As for the DoD's "abandonment" of Ada, you could refer them to the DoD 5000 > SERIES POLICY DOCUMENTS, found at > "http://www.acq.osd.mil/api/asm/dod5000.html". > Here is a snippet from that page: [big snip] Umm. Greg's question was about the future, not the past. Joe Gwinn