From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,14aa27db81ce3b40 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.karotte.org!news2.arglkargh.de!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to exit an Ada program with (unix shell) error code? Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:10:47 -0500 Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Message-ID: References: <49ba30c9-a1e6-4346-8618-d256f87ac301@s31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <8ef6052e-4f51-416b-bae7-ff83d7024267@t11g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <62b174a9-c9c5-479c-9dd6-71916c102eb0@z16g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <2amptg.bg7.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <356247f9-4a83-44aa-a412-4500e6af19cf@f1g2000prb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1241647856 12167 69.95.181.76 (6 May 2009 22:10:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 22:10:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5718 Date: 2009-05-06T17:10:47-05:00 List-Id: "Adam Beneschan" wrote in message news:356247f9-4a83-44aa-a412-4500e6af19cf@f1g2000prb.googlegroups.com... ... > In any case, if you're implying that writing the extra code needed to > get the program to display the function result on the standard output > is an act of self-inflicted pain---trust me, it's nowhere near as > painful as trying to understand and implement 3.10.2. Don't worry, as soon as you think that you've managed that, we'll (the ARG) change it again. Because we don't really understand it either. :-) Randy.