From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,de0abe9655235740 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-07 14:51:09 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border3.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 16:51:06 -0600 Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 17:52:01 -0500 From: Wes Groleau Reply-To: groleau@freeshell.org Organization: Ain't no organization here! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-mx, pt-br, fr-ca MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ACM Ada Letters References: <1065708924.347689@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <3F864440.7070203@noplace.com> <8pWdnd8im8ToEzeiRVn-iw@gbronline.com> <3FAB95B6.9070008@noplace.com> In-Reply-To: <3FAB95B6.9070008@noplace.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.9.86.101 X-Trace: sv3-NeMLsuMprswwrPQfhxDz4otaN5VEe7wRzSzmtx6BbbEvmgTfNZWngynH6Ua6VsMKc5P8YdUhLUFPjJe!JQBur31hogYPXxGeNjdjIk+tr6IV6Y6lEHVlBoULn0LM93oZGVI7ieAwrG6BfJwwY+QDs8vpjK5r!Hg== X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2240 Date: 2003-11-07T17:52:01-05:00 List-Id: Marin David Condic wrote: > Wes Groleau wrote: > >> Ah, but Word automatically substitutes another font, >> and Pat can easily change it if it selects an ugly one. > > I don't think it would be at all unreasonable for a journal to ask > authors to use some specific, common fonts. What's wrong with limiting No, it's perfectly reasonable. I was merely illustrating that one person's suggested reason (might use a font Pat doesn't have) is not a very good reason for not using Word. A _good_ reason might be "it comes from Microsoft." :-) -- Wes Groleau Guidelines for judging others: 1. Don't attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. 2. Don't attribute to stupidity that which can be adequately explained by ignorance. 3. Don't attribute to ignorance that which can be adequately explained by misunderstanding.