From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.228.227 with SMTP id sl3mr2805210pbc.5.1345576713898;
        Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 t10ni10826091pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news.glorb.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec?
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:18:31 +0200
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <gpcuiu6p58gd$.118wuad9bdmvo$.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <501bd285$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <17qgsq5y7or0v.16z18fmcew1lt$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502c149e$0$6579$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <ak8h9w7770bx$.ncrikznng6v3$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502cd701$0$6568$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <pstv4iafyysv$.1mq6dicsj9my0.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502d3c68$0$6572$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <mhbnq53dwqt2.r7w4k1ptmxf1$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502e9039$0$6557$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <40tmogy4d1b5.1kc2gm8qfrkdu.dlg@40tude.net>
 <503240ed$0$6569$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <ciztlfv7tfhf$.taw9f39y1oa4$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <50326457$0$6576$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <1qril0ny3eczr$.1vlhpbrjyyb8k.dlg@40tude.net>
 <503375ac$0$6565$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <1vglgit7vnu4l$.2ytljabrhk2.dlg@40tude.net>
 <5033986c$0$6573$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <62h5nifarvom.1myeqdyevhefq.dlg@40tude.net>
 <5033b4d8$0$6571$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9A8bJrx4NhDLcSmbrb6AdA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-08-21T21:18:31+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:18:32 +0200, Georg Bauhaus wrote:

> On 21.08.12 17:06, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>> "Transformation of XML documents" does not look like a practical problem to
>> make substantial arguments about, it looks like a solution for a problem
>> yet to be stated, of which existence is in question, so far.
> 
> Today's computers exchange data using XML documents.

So, you are proposing XML for exchanging data between computers? Or is it
just statement that some unlucky computers do it this way? What about
better ways?

> They employ
> even driven parsers (SAX), and XSL transformations, to good effect;
> not usually within a systems (what for?), but between systems.
> 
> So what is it that does not exist?

The problem of transformation XML documents does not exist. I don't see why
data exchange needs that. I don't see why any transformations would be
necessary between systems.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de