From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,XPRIO autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b9c193e01cab96e4,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!news.metronet.hr!not-for-mail
From: "abcd" <aa@aa.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: C vs. ada for embeded system
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 13:23:32 +0100
Organization: Metronet
Message-ID: <gotp01$kbm$1@news.metronet.hr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 78.134.136.189
X-Trace: news.metronet.hr 1236428610 20854 78.134.136.189 (7 Mar 2009 12:23:30
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@metronet.hr
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 12:23:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4969
Date: 2009-03-07T13:23:32+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

why ada is better of  "C" language  for embeded system?