From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6dcdd5b561500c28 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.albasani.net!news.gnuher.de!peernews!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!news.online.de!not-for-mail From: Oliver Kowalke Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: smart pointer dangerous (no -> operator) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:46:50 +0100 Organization: 1&1 Internet AG Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: p54b32c96.dip0.t-ipconnect.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: online.de 1232106235 5165 84.179.44.150 (16 Jan 2009 11:43:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@einsundeins.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:43:55 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3379 Date: 2009-01-16T12:46:50+01:00 List-Id: Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:04:57 +0100, Oliver Kowalke wrote: >> Ada doesn't support the dereference operator -> as C++. > It is difficult, since there is no any delegation support in Ada. What are the reasons not to introduce it into Ada2005? > P.S. My implementation of proxy object can be found here > http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de/ada/components.htm#Objects_etc Thanks! I'll take a look into your library regards, Oliver