From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f3d27f1fefd7e554
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!newsfeeder.syd.optusnet.com.au!news.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mail
From: Surfer <surfer@no.spam.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Blocking I/O and Ravenscar
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 05:28:54 +0930
Message-ID: <gegdf3tbrlmktloegcne8689585hdgc7s8@4ax.com>
References: <1190408890.068176.182160@n39g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
 <LU0Ji.97568$Xa3.74710@attbi_s22>
 <1190495840.472000.321860@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
 <vp9df3p4o9u55on11ecse9h179d2rv4b2n@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 58.110.86.47
X-Trace: 1190577460  844 58.110.86.47
X-Original-Bytes: 1458
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2101
Date: 2007-09-24T05:28:54+09:30
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:33:20 +0930, Surfer <surfer@no.spam.net> wrote:

>
>There is a very interesting paper about message passing and Ravenscar
>here: 
>
>Communicating Ada Tasks (2003)  
>http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/577581.html
>
<snip>
>
>Also a closely related paper here:
>
>Extending Ravenscar with CSP Channels
>http://www.springerlink.com/index/j7h8rr665r0x20n9.pdf
>

Actually while having another look at these papers, I noticed that  
"Communicating Ada Tasks" uses three protected objects per channel but
"Extending Ravenscar with CSP Channels" uses only two protected
objects per channel.

That seems to be a considerable improvement.