From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Niklas Holsti Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Why couldn't an operating system be written in ada Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:23:14 +0200 Organization: Tidorum Ltd Message-ID: References: <4s8rud$9j3@tribune> <792fba1b-7a54-4d00-ae85-e6bd0737f001@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net qR+ZW2Bay4Ja+vu2BZ3YgQIznmGCLCjXAwhNWXSYZbn/GUYtIL Cancel-Lock: sha1:s8ahA9vdE+AhxF81MsLUKAw8EnQ= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:55698 Date: 2019-02-27T16:23:14+02:00 List-Id: On 19-02-27 16:06 , russ lyttle wrote: > On 2/27/19 3:20 AM, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >> BTW, nobody sane would ever use POSIX layer on VMS. VMS API were >> infinitely more advanced and comfortable to use in every possible >> aspect. The same can be said about Windows.... >> > Thus my desire for an OS and Ada not dependent on any POSIX layer. To me this seems like a kind of premature optimization. POSIX is not evil in and of itself. Presumably you will not be using VMS, so would no be committing the insanity Dmitry warns against. > Still digging, but it looks to me like gnat depends on a POSIX layer. > Is that true? Certainly false for the AdaCore bare-metal runtimes I've seen. Those systems don't have any POSIX layer. -- Niklas Holsti Tidorum Ltd niklas holsti tidorum fi . @ .