From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1dd28d5040ded1f8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-10 01:34:37 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!skynet.be!skynet.be!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!pec-13-19.tnt2.hh2.uunet.DE!not-for-mail From: Dmitry A. Kazakov Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Announce: Grace project site operational Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:35:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: pec-13-19.tnt2.hh2.uunet.de (149.225.13.19) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1021019675 18636608 149.225.13.19 (16 [77047]) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23824 Date: 2002-05-10T10:35:28+02:00 List-Id: On Thu, 9 May 2002 15:02:47 -0500, "Randy Brukardt" wrote: >Supporting default parameters for generic types would be (I think) a >whole lot simpler than 'types as objects'. Ada has default parameters >for generic subprogram parameters, why not types? > >Something like: > > type Count is (<>) use Natural; > >seems like it would work. Probably worth thinking about a bit. (Warning: >I have made no effort to think about the ramifications of this idea!!) We already have two different words for IS: "is" and ":=", "use" would be a third one. (:-)) --- Regards, Dmitry Kazakov www.dmitry-kazakov.de