From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,55c3d66a7778a37e,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-02-27 03:27:35 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!darwin.sura.net!convex!news.duke.edu!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!jussieu.fr!unilim.fr!NewsWatcher!user
From: gauthier@unilim.fr (Michel Gauthier)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: '9X or '95 ?
Date: 27 Feb 1995 11:27:35 GMT
Organization: Universite de Limoges
Message-ID: <gauthier-2702951122590001@164.81.60.62>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 164.81.60.62
Date: 1995-02-27T11:27:35+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Isn't it now time to say "Ada-95", keeping "Ada-9X" to
denote only the standard re-definition process ?

It would be good advertisement to emphasize that 
_The New Ada_ is here and alive. Some people have already
made this change in their mind, but some occurrences
of "9X" still remain.

-- 
Michel Gauthier - Laboratoire d'informatique - 123 avenue Albert Thomas
F-87060 Limoges - fax +33()55457315
----- Are the messages that objects exchange also objects ? -----