From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HEADER_SPAM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b30bd69fa8f63cb2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: fc772,b30bd69fa8f63cb2 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc772,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-17 10:49:54 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.ems.psu.edu!news.cse.psu.edu!uwm.edu!rpi!not-for-mail From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++.moderated Subject: Re: C bug of the day Date: 17 Jun 2003 13:52:03 -0400 Organization: LJK Software Sender: cppmods@netlab.cs.rpi.edu Message-ID: References: <1054751321.434656@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: netlab.cs.rpi.edu X-Original-Date: 17 Jun 2003 05:57:05 -0500 X-Submission-Address: c++-submit@netlab.cs.rpi.edu X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.lang.c++.moderated iQBVAwUAPu9VP0HMCo9UcraBAQGhAQH+ObiXtiRpxAuiN10jWmmOgWFts2u/9/oV BpQcRm2rWjVZACKFjdtlUmIY1QQqUa5H7whORd2i/wRghCYVO6L2Lw== =hsW/ Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39356 comp.lang.c++.moderated:68550 Date: 2003-06-17T13:52:03-04:00 List-Id: In article , Andy Sawyer writes: > In article , > on 12 Jun 2003 20:39:38 -0400, > Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) wrote: > > > The typical Ada expert believes in code review, formal inspection, > > fault analysis, project specification and many other activities that > > would be useless if there were a perfect programming language. > > None of these activities would be useless if there were a perfect > programming language. What use would they have ? The perfect programming language, unlike Ada or C* would find human logic errors and specification faults ! [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ] [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]