From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b1ebfe7f8f5e385d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-02 09:18:22 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!wn12feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!rwcrnsc54.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Generic formal access types References: <3eb23fca$1@epflnews.epfl.ch> X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.234.13.56 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: rwcrnsc54 1051892300 12.234.13.56 (Fri, 02 May 2003 16:18:20 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 16:18:20 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 16:18:20 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36867 Date: 2003-05-02T16:18:20+00:00 List-Id: >declare > type Ptr is access Integer; > package Instance is new Generic_Package (Integer); > P : Ptr; >... >Here, P is of type "Ptr" and the function returns "Node_Content_Ptr". >For the compiler to accept this, I will have to declare Ptr as "access >all Integer" and do an explicit conversion: Why not declare package Instance is new Generic_Package (Integer); subtype Ptr is Instance.Node_Content_Ptr; P : Ptr;