From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ad50e6a11b0a7c8a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-07 00:19:25 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn14feed!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!rwcrnsc53.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Releasing long file anmes in .zip/.tar.gz? References: X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.234.13.56 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: rwcrnsc53 1047025164 12.234.13.56 (Fri, 07 Mar 2003 08:19:24 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 08:19:24 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 08:19:24 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:35014 Date: 2003-03-07T08:19:24+00:00 List-Id: > I work under Linux. Windows archivers do not accept ZIP files created > by Linux "zip" with long filenames (more than 8.3). Surely there are Linux "zip" utilities that will handle long filenames. The pkzip25.exe I use on Windows does, and it's dated 4/15/1998 > - Release in .tar.gz (Hey, Windows users, are you all able to extreact?) Personally, I prefer .zip > - Use file names shortened to 8.3 (krunching) You could give any sort of name and tell folks they have to run gnatchop to get long names. An extra step, but it works.