From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1db77fbb2768946e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1143c4,7d107e452bdd8496
X-Google-Attributes: gid1143c4,public
X-Google-Thread: 115aec,7d107e452bdd8496
X-Google-Attributes: gid115aec,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-02 10:50:30 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed1.uncensored-news.com!propagator-la!news-in-la.newsfeeds.com!news-in.superfeed.net!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: linux.dev.kernel,comp.realtime,comp.lang.ada
From: Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com>
References: <Hcst7.10135$T24.6287173@typhoon.san.rr.com>
 <3BB69F21.B5AA7451@intercom.com> <9p84tm$1ovg$1@news.cybercity.dk>
 <9pa0in$8bb$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <20011002.79FF698.96B5@mojaveg.iwvisp.com>
Subject: Re: Is Linux right for Embedded?
Message-ID: <g7nu7.13076$ev2.21083@www.newsranger.com>
X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please
X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or
X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 13:50:04 EDT
Organization: http://www.newsranger.com
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 17:50:04 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com linux.dev.kernel:4243 comp.realtime:3925
 comp.lang.ada:13631
Date: 2001-10-02T17:50:04+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <20011002.79FF698.96B5@mojaveg.iwvisp.com>, Everett M. Greene says...
>
>"Marin David Condic" <dont.bother.mcondic.auntie.spam@[acm.org> writes:
>
>> As an "Ada Freak" in good standing :-) let me say this:
>> [snip]
>> Compared to other languages we used, we got a doubling of
>> productivity and a four-fold reduction in errors.
>
>Is there any published information to illustrate or support
>this statement?

I know some relating to C, but not C++ (probably because its so new).

---
T.E.D.    homepage   - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html
          home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. 
However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.