From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 101deb,15c6ed4b761968e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid1094ba,gid101deb,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 04:06:50 -0500 Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 02:07:18 -0700 From: glen herrmannsfeldt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1 Subject: Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications References: <0ugu4e.4i7.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <%P_cg.155733$eR6.26337@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <6H9dg.10258$S7.9150@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <1hfv5wb.1x4ab1tbdzk7eN%nospam@see.signature> <20060712.7A4E6E0.D028@mojaveg.lsan.sisna <20060714.7A4E988.A30D@mojaveg.lsan.sisna.com> In-Reply-To: <20060714.7A4E988.A30D@mojaveg.lsan.sisna.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.18.174.4 X-Trace: sv3-VBf2zmp+5PQ6gznrPIEdBhaeGPYTTr6JPXOuk3Z1mgJvLLm4cGjsuiVUhQSdthWuyNh4/9XU1Lg1LHi!PDvNwXdAV4KQajMg4dGSlpAqJPwLwvIf61XOF8gI/oFeiZdmQqN24vHTFiysTZB4Mt/KodbtOXjh!RFgXuw== X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5720 comp.lang.fortran:12067 comp.lang.pl1:2015 Date: 2006-07-16T02:07:18-07:00 List-Id: Everett M. Greene wrote: (snip) > Doing multi-precision arithmetic on a ones complement > machine can be a real challenge. Well, you want unsigned arithmetic to do multiple precision, which is harder if a machine only supplies ones complement. -- glen