From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 115aec,10a739dd228c3f5e
X-Google-Attributes: gid115aec,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ff18b3dfbae1e1d6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-28 09:01:47 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.realtime
Subject: Re: Ada as a real time language
Date: 28 Aug 2002 11:01:44 -0600
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <g3zsNulq3VxJ@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <aki282$jhp$1@newstoo.ericsson.se>
 <3D6CEB7E.E6930EAD@avionics.saab.se>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1030549427 24554 192.135.80.34 (28 Aug 2002
 15:43:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 15:43:47 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28508 comp.realtime:6141
Date: 2002-08-28T11:01:44-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3D6CEB7E.E6930EAD@avionics.saab.se>, Mikael Lundqvist <mikael.lundqvist@avionics.saab.se> writes:
> I have heard that the Ada Run Time doesn't handle load
> that well. If you have to many tasks or to much input/output
> the Runtime gives in so to speak. In that regard you should
> be better of with a RTOS. I have not any experience myself
> with large Ada programs. Anybody out there who could comment?

There is no such entity as "the Ada Run Time".  There may be one
associated with particular Ada implementations, but performance
characteristics are associated with particular implementations
and not with the conceptual notion.