From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Things that OO programming lacks
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 20:33:10 +0100
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <g3jcc8kk1doi$.10ila1hrs184k$.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <DA%7w.753721$Y4.288171@fx24.iad>
 <YYE8w.620042$Lj7.284655@fx22.iad> <87389olqie.fsf@ixod.org>
 <zTF8w.509165$No4.167804@fx19.iad>
 <fca06fd0-6970-46a5-95b9-6b6317a37f7c@googlegroups.com>
 <aSG8w.567817$Q61.266688@fx13.iad> <m40odq$tdv$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <DbU8w.703256$Fo3.563225@fx09.iad> <m439g4$bq9$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <m43c6o$1v1$1@dont-email.me> <10d9w.55626$8w1.22302@fx12.iad>
 <150er0b62wsh3$.1xabmp81w5kdw.dlg@40tude.net>
 <m44gfo$1kb$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <1azsoc77wjhmi$.1grmnnlq033tz.dlg@40tude.net>
 <m44m2p$f9k$1@speranza.aioe.org> <5yzci4a8snfg.1dfsqjyvneeym$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <m45757$huh$1@dont-email.me> <bezyvi09ddfl.1du5bw4wk652f$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <m48aj3$i5u$1@dont-email.me> <yt48qnxs5uqv.xi5qk26z808b$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <rm6aw.762423$w82.743350@fx21.iad>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: wfRpp7ltpEWhI2na6kgpfA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:23429
Date: 2014-11-16T20:33:10+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sun, 16 Nov 2014 11:51:03 -0700, Shark8 wrote:

> On 16-Nov-14 03:18, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>> There is no "our objects" in non-object-oriented paradigms.
> 
> Sure there is:
> Ada 83 LRM 3.2, first sentence:
> "An object is an entity that contains (has) a value of a given type."
> 
> It's widely acknowledged that Ada 83 is/was not object-oriented; 
> therefore either the definition (LRM) is wrong, or your assertion is.

Sure there are computational object. The question is whether the paradigm
promotes them or tries to abstract away.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de