From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7dbba1cd16d32bb8
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!eweka.nl!lightspeed.eweka.nl!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.belwue.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!news.online.de!not-for-mail
From: Oliver Kellogg <okellogg@users.sourceforge.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada OOP syntax
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:16:56 +0200
Organization: 1&1 Internet AG
Message-ID: <g313nr$uih$1@online.de>
References: <_9adnb1KYvIrW87VnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@comcast.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p549cb588.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: online.de 1213469243 31313 84.156.181.136 (14 Jun 2008 18:47:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@einsundeins.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:47:23 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: KNode/0.9.0
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:704
Date: 2008-06-14T20:16:56+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Steve wrote:

> For a programming language that has so much right, Ada sure has oop syntax
> wrong.  What's more is the syntax is inconsistant with a lot of things
> that Ada got right and other languages didn't.

Do you know http://mats.weber.org/thesis/Ada-Extensions.pdf ?

Not sure if it's spot on for you but well worth the read, IMHO.

--Oliver