From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,9fb8e2af320d5b3e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Bus error References: <0367891DA5DA7E408D42A860FA002F44B0CC48@sma2901.cr.eurocopter.corp> <1l4yqvxoid4n1.1u8eo4oo8ml4m$.dlg@40tude.net> From: Markus E Leypold Organization: N/A Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:37:47 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BvcGmJnbTNxFpm1K8kIHJypAYXg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.72.251.217 X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1183130856 88.72.251.217 (29 Jun 2007 17:27:36 +0200) X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed0.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16346 Date: 2007-06-29T17:37:47+02:00 List-Id: Dmitry said: > On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:35:28 +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > >>>> ... one objection against Ada 2005 design is that now it is impossible >>> to > have types which objects were strictly temporal, i.e. to prevent >>> creation > of variables. Consider this: >>>> >>>> [ type T (<>) is limited private; ] >>>> >>>> X : T := Factory; -- Was illegal in Ada 95 >> in Ada 95 you could do >> >> X : T renames Factory; > Yes, you're right. It should be illegal. Semantically it is same as So there never was a feature "to have types which objects were strictly temporal". You just changed your agenda. Regards -- Markus