From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,78b2880bc7e78e39 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-14 15:03:24 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: Fraser Wilson Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: RISC Date: 14 Mar 2001 15:03:15 -0800 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: Sender: fraser@icarus References: <3AAFE967.44BAEDAD@averstar.com> X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.5/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald" X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:5743 Date: 2001-03-14T15:03:15-08:00 List-Id: "chris.danx" writes: > * procedure set_data (reg : in out register; > * data : in word) is > * begin > * -- and this! > * reg.data := ((reg.data / 65536) * 65536) xor long_word(data); > * end set_data; If that's inefficient, what about reg.data := (reg.data and 16#FFFF0000) or register_block (data); > * -- i've got to improve the efficiency of this; > * reg.data := ((reg.data / 256) * 256 ) xor register_block(data); Similarly, reg.data := (reg.data and 16#FFFFFF00#) or register_block (data); Fraser.