From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public From: Matt Austern Subject: Re: What is wrong with OO ? Date: 1997/01/03 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 207534460 references: <5acjtn$5uj@news3.digex.net> organization: SGI newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng Date: 1997-01-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony) writes: > Oh, I don't know. I think C++ was created simply because BS was > saddled with C (at ATT) and wanted _something_ that had a least _some_ > abstraction capabilities in it. Voila. C++. Whether it is any more > "usable" than several other options is highly open to question. And > in fact, in general I would say the answer is "no". It's not necessary to speculate on why Bjarne Stroustrup made the design decisions that he did: he discusses them, in a fair amount of detail, in _The Design and Evolution of C++_. I probably shouldn't try to summarize an entire book in a single sentence. One thing he makes very clear in his book, though, is that he was trying to create a language that, like C, made it possible to write low-level programs, but that also, like Simula, included high-level abstraction facilities. This combination is, if not unique to C++, at least rare. It's also quite clear that it was a design goal from the very beginning.