From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,3a1c64628a09855b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Lack of formal syntax undermines Ada Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:37:08 -0500 Organization: Jacob's private Usenet server Message-ID: References: <47ff4970$0$19809$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net> <0d5b2ee5-56e7-446f-b29c-564580263c3e@i36g2000prf.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net X-Trace: jacob-sparre.dk 1208414260 11282 69.95.181.76 (17 Apr 2008 06:37:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:37:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1914 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20979 Date: 2008-04-17T01:37:08-05:00 List-Id: wrote in message news:0d5b2ee5-56e7-446f-b29c-564580263c3e@i36g2000prf.googlegroups.com... ... > I was surprised to see Annex P marked as "informative". > I took this as shorthand for a statement of the form: > "This Annex is a collection of the syntax rules presented in other > sections of the document. Because of the dangers of a transcription > error, it is informative only. The syntax rules as they appear in > the other sections are normative" That is exactly correct. Although there isn't much chance of a transcription error: it (and Annexes K and L for that matter) are automatically generated from the rest of the standard when it is formatted. (A number of other annexes are also constructed this way, but partially from text that doesn't actually appear in the Standard, so there is more chance of an error in those. But I believe that K, L, and P are constructed only from text that actually appears in the Standard, so the chances of error are low.) Randy.